On Sat, Mar 03, 2018 at 09:57:15PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 03/03/2018 05:02 PM, Daniel Axtens wrote:
> >> From: Daniel Axtens
> >>
> >> SCTP GSO skbs have a gso_size of GSO_BY_FRAGS, so any sort of
> >> unconditionally mangling of that will result in nonsense value
> >> and would corrup
On 03/03/2018 05:02 PM, Daniel Axtens wrote:
>> From: Daniel Axtens
>>
>> SCTP GSO skbs have a gso_size of GSO_BY_FRAGS, so any sort of
>> unconditionally mangling of that will result in nonsense value
>> and would corrupt the skb later on.
>>
>> Therefore, i) add two helpers skb_increase_gso_size
Hi Daniel,
> From: Daniel Axtens
>
> SCTP GSO skbs have a gso_size of GSO_BY_FRAGS, so any sort of
> unconditionally mangling of that will result in nonsense value
> and would corrupt the skb later on.
>
> Therefore, i) add two helpers skb_increase_gso_size() and
> skb_decrease_gso_size() that wo
From: Daniel Axtens
SCTP GSO skbs have a gso_size of GSO_BY_FRAGS, so any sort of
unconditionally mangling of that will result in nonsense value
and would corrupt the skb later on.
Therefore, i) add two helpers skb_increase_gso_size() and
skb_decrease_gso_size() that would throw a one time warni