Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpftool: make libbfd optional

2018-11-16 Thread Stanislav Fomichev
On 11/16, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 08:52:23PM -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote: > > I actually wanted to follow up with a v2 when > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/11/16/243 reaches bpf-next (I got an ack > > already). > > it will go via perf tree, so not related. My underst

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpftool: make libbfd optional

2018-11-16 Thread Alexei Starovoitov
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 08:52:23PM -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote: > I actually wanted to follow up with a v2 when > https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/11/16/243 reaches bpf-next (I got an ack > already). it will go via perf tree, so not related. > Alternatively, I can follow up with another patch on to

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpftool: make libbfd optional

2018-11-16 Thread Alexei Starovoitov
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 1:44 PM Stanislav Fomichev wrote: > > Make it possible to build bpftool without libbfd. libbfd and libopcodes are > typically provided in dev/dbg packages (binutils-dev in debian) which we > usually don't have installed on the fleet machines and we'd like a way to have > bp

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpftool: make libbfd optional

2018-11-15 Thread Stanislav Fomichev
On 11/13, Quentin Monnet wrote: > 2018-11-12 14:02 UTC-0800 ~ Jakub Kicinski > > On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 13:44:10 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote: > >> Make it possible to build bpftool without libbfd. libbfd and libopcodes are > >> typically provided in dev/dbg packages (binutils-dev in debian) which

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpftool: make libbfd optional

2018-11-13 Thread Stanislav Fomichev
On 11/13, Quentin Monnet wrote: > 2018-11-12 14:02 UTC-0800 ~ Jakub Kicinski > > On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 13:44:10 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote: > >> Make it possible to build bpftool without libbfd. libbfd and libopcodes are > >> typically provided in dev/dbg packages (binutils-dev in debian) which

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpftool: make libbfd optional

2018-11-12 Thread Quentin Monnet
2018-11-12 14:02 UTC-0800 ~ Jakub Kicinski > On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 13:44:10 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote: >> Make it possible to build bpftool without libbfd. libbfd and libopcodes are >> typically provided in dev/dbg packages (binutils-dev in debian) which we >> usually don't have installed on t

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpftool: make libbfd optional

2018-11-12 Thread Jakub Kicinski
On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 13:44:10 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote: > Make it possible to build bpftool without libbfd. libbfd and libopcodes are > typically provided in dev/dbg packages (binutils-dev in debian) which we > usually don't have installed on the fleet machines and we'd like a way to have > b

[PATCH bpf-next v2] bpftool: make libbfd optional

2018-11-12 Thread Stanislav Fomichev
Make it possible to build bpftool without libbfd. libbfd and libopcodes are typically provided in dev/dbg packages (binutils-dev in debian) which we usually don't have installed on the fleet machines and we'd like a way to have bpftool version that works without installing any additional packages.