On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 03:26:15PM -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> On 12/04, Song Liu wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 8:01 PM Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > >
> > > We are returning thoff from the flow dissector, not the nhoff. Pass
> > > thoff along with nhoff to the bpf program (initially
On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 3:26 PM Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
>
> On 12/04, Song Liu wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 8:01 PM Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > >
> > > We are returning thoff from the flow dissector, not the nhoff. Pass
> > > thoff along with nhoff to the bpf program (initially thoff ==
On 12/04, Song Liu wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 8:01 PM Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> >
> > We are returning thoff from the flow dissector, not the nhoff. Pass
> > thoff along with nhoff to the bpf program (initially thoff == nhoff)
> > and expect flow dissector amend/return thoff, not nhoff.
>
On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 8:01 PM Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
>
> We are returning thoff from the flow dissector, not the nhoff. Pass
> thoff along with nhoff to the bpf program (initially thoff == nhoff)
> and expect flow dissector amend/return thoff, not nhoff.
>
> This avoids confusion, when by the
We are returning thoff from the flow dissector, not the nhoff. Pass
thoff along with nhoff to the bpf program (initially thoff == nhoff)
and expect flow dissector amend/return thoff, not nhoff.
This avoids confusion, when by the time bpf flow dissector exits,
nhoff == thoff, which doesn't make