Re: [PATCH iproute2] geneve: fix IPv6 remote address reporting

2016-05-13 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Fri, 6 May 2016 15:28:25 +0100 Edward Cree wrote: > Since we can only configure unicast, we probably want to be able to > display unicast, rather than multicast. > > Fixes: 906ac5437ab8 ("geneve: add support for IPv6 link partners") > Signed-off-by: Edward Cree

Re: [PATCH iproute2] geneve: fix IPv6 remote address reporting

2016-05-06 Thread Phil Sutter
On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 04:14:11PM +0100, Edward Cree wrote: > On 06/05/16 15:43, Phil Sutter wrote: > > On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 03:28:25PM +0100, Edward Cree wrote: > >> Since we can only configure unicast, we probably want to be able to > >> display unicast, rather than multicast. > >

Re: [PATCH iproute2] geneve: fix IPv6 remote address reporting

2016-05-06 Thread Edward Cree
On 06/05/16 15:43, Phil Sutter wrote: > On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 03:28:25PM +0100, Edward Cree wrote: >> Since we can only configure unicast, we probably want to be able to >> display unicast, rather than multicast. > Furthermore, the kernel even rejects multicast peer addresses. Yes, but a future

Re: [PATCH iproute2] geneve: fix IPv6 remote address reporting

2016-05-06 Thread Phil Sutter
On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 03:28:25PM +0100, Edward Cree wrote: > Since we can only configure unicast, we probably want to be able to > display unicast, rather than multicast. Furthermore, the kernel even rejects multicast peer addresses. > I'm assuming this is what was intended, but tbh I don't

[PATCH iproute2] geneve: fix IPv6 remote address reporting

2016-05-06 Thread Edward Cree
Since we can only configure unicast, we probably want to be able to display unicast, rather than multicast. Fixes: 906ac5437ab8 ("geneve: add support for IPv6 link partners") Signed-off-by: Edward Cree --- I'm assuming this is what was intended, but tbh I don't know why we