On Wed, 15 Apr 2015 14:00:53 +0200
Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> XFRM netlink family is independent from the route netlink family. It's wrong
> to call rtnl_wilddump_request(), because it will add a 'struct ifinfomsg' into
> the header and the kernel will complain (at least for xfrm state):
>
> netli
XFRM netlink family is independent from the route netlink family. It's wrong
to call rtnl_wilddump_request(), because it will add a 'struct ifinfomsg' into
the header and the kernel will complain (at least for xfrm state):
netlink: 24 bytes leftover after parsing attributes in process `ip'.
Repor
