On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 4:32 AM, Xin Long wrote:
>> Commit 55917a21d0cc ("netfilter: x_tables: add context to know if
>> extension runs from nft_compat") introduced a member nft_compat to
>>
On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 4:32 AM, Xin Long wrote:
> Commit 55917a21d0cc ("netfilter: x_tables: add context to know if
> extension runs from nft_compat") introduced a member nft_compat to
> xt_tgchk_param structure.
>
> But it didn't set it's value for ipt_init_target. With
Commit 55917a21d0cc ("netfilter: x_tables: add context to know if
extension runs from nft_compat") introduced a member nft_compat to
xt_tgchk_param structure.
But it didn't set it's value for ipt_init_target. With unexpected
value in par.nft_compat, it may return unexpected result in some