Hello,
First, it indeed can be handled by user space. (even though it should
be done twice, once for ifconig of net-tools and once for ip of
iproute2) / However, we have already
methods which deal with bringing down an interface - neigh_ifdown(),
and changing MAC address of an interface
On Sun, 2007-23-12 at 08:17 -0500, jamal wrote:
On Sun, 2007-23-12 at 22:04 +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 wrote:
If the secondary MACs are used with ARP/NDP, we should take care of
that, but I think we use the primary MAC for ARP/NDP, no?
(In other words, we always use primary MAC for
On Mon, 2007-24-12 at 15:38 +0200, David Shwatrz wrote:
Hello,
First, it indeed can be handled by user space. (even though it should
be done twice, once for ifconig of net-tools and once for ip of
iproute2)
it needs to be done once only: reacting to netlink events when MAC
address
Hello,
Attached here is the patch - please read the following text here below:
We know that changes in MAC addresses are not frequent but
we are working on a special, highly advanced networking Linux based project
in our LABs, where we do change MAC addresses of an interface quite frequently.
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] (at Sun, 23 Dec 2007 13:41:36 +0200), David
Shwatrz [EMAIL PROTECTED] says:
I had written a small patch to neigh_changeaddr() in net/core/neighbour.c
against the 2.6 git net tree, which sends a gratuitous ARP to update
the list of
all the involved neighbours with
Hi,
Oop, I am TWICE sorry ! I wrongly attached a wrong, empty file.
Attached here is the patch.
Regarding your answer; I accept it and I will soon send a revised
version of this patch (making changes to
arp_netdev_event() and ndisc_netdev_event().)
I had IPv4 in mind, there is no reason that
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] (at Sun, 23 Dec 2007 14:24:00 +0200), David
Shwatrz [EMAIL PROTECTED] says:
Regarding your answer; I accept it and I will soon send a revised
version of this patch (making changes to
arp_netdev_event() and ndisc_netdev_event().)
I had IPv4 in mind, there is no
On Sun, 2007-23-12 at 21:38 +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] (at Sun, 23 Dec 2007 14:24:00 +0200), David
Shwatrz [EMAIL PROTECTED] says:
Regarding your answer; I accept it and I will soon send a revised
version of this patch (making changes to
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] (at Sun, 23 Dec 2007 07:46:15 -0500), jamal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] says:
On Sun, 2007-23-12 at 21:38 +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] (at Sun, 23 Dec 2007 14:24:00 +0200), David
Shwatrz [EMAIL PROTECTED] says:
Regarding your
Hello,
You should iterate all of ifa_list (for IPv4) / addr_list (for IPv6).
For IPv6, we also have anycast (maintained by ac_list) as well.
I am not sure that we need to iterate all of ifa_list in IPv4.
The reason is that we end with arp_send, and it initiates a broadcast.
So all neighbours
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] (at Sun, 23 Dec 2007 15:04:37 +0200), David
Shwatrz [EMAIL PROTECTED] says:
Hello,
You should iterate all of ifa_list (for IPv4) / addr_list (for IPv6).
For IPv6, we also have anycast (maintained by ac_list) as well.
I am not sure that we need to iterate
On Sun, 2007-23-12 at 22:04 +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 wrote:
If the secondary MACs are used with ARP/NDP, we should take care of
that, but I think we use the primary MAC for ARP/NDP, no?
(In other words, we always use primary MAC for ARP reply / NA, no?)
I think it maybe a policy
Yoshfuji,
Thanks, you are right ! soon I will send the patches.
Thanks !
DS
On Dec 23, 2007 3:13 PM, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] (at Sun, 23 Dec 2007 15:04:37 +0200), David
Shwatrz [EMAIL PROTECTED] says:
Hello,
You should iterate
David Shwatrz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Oop, I am TWICE sorry ! I wrongly attached a wrong, empty file.
Attached here is the patch.
Regarding your answer; I accept it and I will soon send a revised
version of this patch (making changes to
arp_netdev_event() and ndisc_netdev_event().)
14 matches
Mail list logo
