Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Cedric Le Goater wrote:
>
>> Cedric Le Goater wrote:
>>> Below are the messages I got on 2) right after running ketchup (which does
>>> a wget www.kernel.org)
>
> Oops, those tcp_fragment WARNINGs in the other mail were due to bug in
> the debug patch
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Cedric Le Goater wrote:
> Cedric Le Goater wrote:
> >
> > Below are the messages I got on 2) right after running ketchup (which does
> > a wget www.kernel.org)
Oops, those tcp_fragment WARNINGs in the other mail were due to bug in
the debug patch as it called verify too ea
Cedric Le Goater wrote:
> Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
>> On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Cedric Le Goater wrote:
>>
>>> Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
Ah, that's path 1) then... Since you seem to have enough time, I would say
that the path 1 is good as well and bugs unrelated to the fix will show up
there too.
Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Cedric Le Goater wrote:
>
>> Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
>>> Ah, that's path 1) then... Since you seem to have enough time, I would say
>>> that the path 1 is good as well and bugs unrelated to the fix will show up
>>> there too...
>> arg. yes. sorry for the c
Cedric Le Goater wrote:
> Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
>> On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Cedric Le Goater wrote:
>>
>>> Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
Ah, that's path 1) then... Since you seem to have enough time, I would say
that the path 1 is good as well and bugs unrelated to the fix will show up
there too.
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Cedric Le Goater wrote:
> Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> >
> > Ah, that's path 1) then... Since you seem to have enough time, I would say
> > that the path 1 is good as well and bugs unrelated to the fix will show up
> > there too...
>
> arg. yes. sorry for the confusion.
>
> > I
Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Cedric Le Goater wrote:
>
>> Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
>>> On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Cedric Le Goater wrote:
>>>
I'm dropping the previous patches you sent me and switching to this
patchset.
right ?
>>> Yes you can do that... However, there are two
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Cedric Le Goater wrote:
> Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Cedric Le Goater wrote:
> >
> >> I'm dropping the previous patches you sent me and switching to this
> >> patchset.
> >> right ?
> >
> > Yes you can do that... However, there are two ways forward:
> >
>
Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Cedric Le Goater wrote:
>
>> Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
>>> Sacktag fastpath_cnt_hint seems to be very tricky to get right...
>>> I suppose this one fixes Cedric's case. I cannot say for sure
>>> until there is something more definite indication of
>>> tcp_
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Cedric Le Goater wrote:
> Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > Sacktag fastpath_cnt_hint seems to be very tricky to get right...
> > I suppose this one fixes Cedric's case. I cannot say for sure
> > until there is something more definite indication of
> > tcp_retrans_try_collapse origi
Hello Ilpo !
Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> Sacktag fastpath_cnt_hint seems to be very tricky to get right...
> I suppose this one fixes Cedric's case. I cannot say for sure
> until there is something more definite indication of
> tcp_retrans_try_collapse origin than what the simple late
Hi Dave,
Sacktag fastpath_cnt_hint seems to be very tricky to get right...
I suppose this one fixes Cedric's case. I cannot say for sure
until there is something more definite indication of
tcp_retrans_try_collapse origin than what the simple late WARN_ON
gave for us. ...Especially since it's
12 matches
Mail list logo
