From: Daniel Borkmann
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 01:15:44 +0100
> General assumption is that single program can hold up to BPF_MAXINSNS,
> that is, 4096 number of instructions. It is the case with cBPF and
> that limit was carried over to eBPF. When recently testing digest, I
>
On 12/07/2016 10:42 AM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
Hello!
On 12/7/2016 3:15 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
General assumption is that single program can hold up to BPF_MAXINSNS,
that is, 4096 number of instructions. It is the case with cBPF and
Up to BPF_MAXINSNS (that is 4096) instructions.
Hello!
On 12/7/2016 3:15 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
General assumption is that single program can hold up to BPF_MAXINSNS,
that is, 4096 number of instructions. It is the case with cBPF and
Up to BPF_MAXINSNS (that is 4096) instructions.
that limit was carried over to eBPF. When
General assumption is that single program can hold up to BPF_MAXINSNS,
that is, 4096 number of instructions. It is the case with cBPF and
that limit was carried over to eBPF. When recently testing digest, I
noticed that it's actually not possible to feed 4096 instructions
via bpf(2).
The check