Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 05:54:19PM CEST, da...@davemloft.net wrote:
>From: Nicolas Dichtel
>Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 13:59:34 +0200
>
>> Le 27/04/2016 18:55, David Miller a écrit :
>>> From: Jiri Pirko
>> [snip]
The difference is that it this tries to allow userspace crap to mirror
setting u
Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 10:48:17AM CEST, nicolas.dich...@6wind.com wrote:
>Le 28/04/2016 17:54, David Miller a écrit :
>[snip]
>> You can say whatever you want, but the facilities you are adding to
>> this driver enables proprietary userland SDK components.
>>
>> And this is precisely what we are try
Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 01:59:34PM CEST, nicolas.dich...@6wind.com wrote:
>Le 27/04/2016 18:55, David Miller a écrit :
>> From: Jiri Pirko
>[snip]
>>> The difference is that it this tries to allow userspace crap to mirror
>>> setting user does for bridge/ovs. Basically this looks to me like an
>>> at
Le 28/04/2016 17:54, David Miller a écrit :
[snip]
> You can say whatever you want, but the facilities you are adding to
> this driver enables proprietary userland SDK components.
>
> And this is precisely what we are trying to avoid by having a clean,
> fully featured switch device model in the k
From: Nicolas Dichtel
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 13:59:34 +0200
> Le 27/04/2016 18:55, David Miller a écrit :
>> From: Jiri Pirko
> [snip]
>>> The difference is that it this tries to allow userspace crap to mirror
>>> setting user does for bridge/ovs. Basically this looks to me like an
>>> attempt t
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> Le 27/04/2016 18:55, David Miller a écrit :
>> From: Jiri Pirko
>>> The difference is that it this tries to allow userspace crap to mirror
>>> setting user does for bridge/ovs. Basically this looks to me like an
>>> attempt to enable userspace SDKs
Le 27/04/2016 19:07, Stephen Hemminger a écrit :
[snip]
> Also it has a bunch of device specific generic netlink which was
> a red flag for me.
>
Ok, I will rework this part.
Le 27/04/2016 18:55, David Miller a écrit :
> From: Jiri Pirko
[snip]
>> The difference is that it this tries to allow userspace crap to mirror
>> setting user does for bridge/ovs. Basically this looks to me like an
>> attempt to enable userspace SDKs and such.
>
> +1
I don't think so because a u
On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 12:55:06 -0400 (EDT)
David Miller wrote:
> From: Jiri Pirko
> Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 17:14:04 +0200
>
> > Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 11:56:15AM CEST, f...@strlen.de wrote:
> >>Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> >>> This patch adds the support of the 6WIND SHULTI switch. It is a software
>
From: Jiri Pirko
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 17:14:04 +0200
> Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 11:56:15AM CEST, f...@strlen.de wrote:
>>Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
>>> This patch adds the support of the 6WIND SHULTI switch. It is a software
>>> switch doing L2 forwarding.
>>>
>>> This first version implements the mi
From: Nicolas Dichtel
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 11:37:18 +0200
> +/* rtnl linkinfo attributes */
> +enum {
> + IFLA_SHULTI_UNSPEC,
> + IFLA_SHULTI_SWDEV_ID,
> + IFLA_SHULTI_SWDEV_PORTID,
> + IFLA_SHULTI_PHYS_PORT_NAME,
> +
> + __IFLA_SHULTI_MAX
> +#define IFLA_SHULTI_MAX (__
Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 05:38:09PM CEST, nicolas.dich...@6wind.com wrote:
>Le 27/04/2016 17:14, Jiri Pirko a écrit :
>> Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 11:56:15AM CEST, f...@strlen.de wrote:
>>> Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
This patch adds the support of the 6WIND SHULTI switch. It is a software
switch doin
Le 27/04/2016 17:14, Jiri Pirko a écrit :
> Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 11:56:15AM CEST, f...@strlen.de wrote:
>> Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
>>> This patch adds the support of the 6WIND SHULTI switch. It is a software
>>> switch doing L2 forwarding.
>>>
>>> This first version implements the minimum needed to
Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 11:56:15AM CEST, f...@strlen.de wrote:
>Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
>> This patch adds the support of the 6WIND SHULTI switch. It is a software
>> switch doing L2 forwarding.
>>
>> This first version implements the minimum needed to get the device working.
>> It also implements, v
Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> This patch adds the support of the 6WIND SHULTI switch. It is a software
> switch doing L2 forwarding.
>
> This first version implements the minimum needed to get the device working.
> It also implements, via switchdev and rtnetlink, bridge forwarding offload,
> including
Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 11:37:18AM CEST, nicolas.dich...@6wind.com wrote:
>This patch adds the support of the 6WIND SHULTI switch. It is a software
>switch doing L2 forwarding.
>
>This first version implements the minimum needed to get the device working.
>It also implements, via switchdev and rtnetli
This patch adds the support of the 6WIND SHULTI switch. It is a software
switch doing L2 forwarding.
This first version implements the minimum needed to get the device working.
It also implements, via switchdev and rtnetlink, bridge forwarding offload,
including FDB static entries, FDB learning an
17 matches
Mail list logo
