On Wed, 2015-05-27 at 11:33 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-05-27 at 14:21 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> > Yeah it's easiest if I just apply this to net-next, which I've just done,
> > thanks Eric.
>
> Fine with me. There's no point creating cross tree hassle for a simple
> include p
On Wed, 2015-05-27 at 14:21 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet
> Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 21:43:44 -0700
>
> > From: Eric Dumazet
> >
> > vmalloc.h used to be included from include/net/inet_hashtables.h
> > but it is no longer the case.
> >
> > Fixes: 095dc8e0c368 ("tcp: fix/cleanup
From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 21:43:44 -0700
> From: Eric Dumazet
>
> vmalloc.h used to be included from include/net/inet_hashtables.h
> but it is no longer the case.
>
> Fixes: 095dc8e0c368 ("tcp: fix/cleanup inet_ehash_locks_alloc()")
> Reported-by: kbuild test robot
> Signed-of
From: Eric Dumazet
vmalloc.h used to be included from include/net/inet_hashtables.h
but it is no longer the case.
Fixes: 095dc8e0c368 ("tcp: fix/cleanup inet_ehash_locks_alloc()")
Reported-by: kbuild test robot
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet
---
Given its broken in David net-next tree, its probab
