Re: [PATCH net-next] trace_events_filter: conditional trace event (tcp_probe full=0)

2018-02-12 Thread Md. Islam
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 11:29 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 00:08:46 -0500 > "Md. Islam" wrote: > >> Recently tcp_probe kernel module has been replaced by trace_event. Old >> tcp_probe had full=0 option where it only takes a snapshot

Re: [PATCH net-next] trace_events_filter: conditional trace event (tcp_probe full=0)

2018-02-12 Thread David Miller
From: Masami Hiramatsu Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 01:29:03 +0900 > On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 00:08:46 -0500 > "Md. Islam" wrote: > >> Recently tcp_probe kernel module has been replaced by trace_event. Old >> tcp_probe had full=0 option where it only takes a

Re: [PATCH net-next] trace_events_filter: conditional trace event (tcp_probe full=0)

2018-02-12 Thread Masami Hiramatsu
On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 00:08:46 -0500 "Md. Islam" wrote: > Recently tcp_probe kernel module has been replaced by trace_event. Old > tcp_probe had full=0 option where it only takes a snapshot only when > congestion window is changed. However I did not find such > functionality in

[PATCH net-next] trace_events_filter: conditional trace event (tcp_probe full=0)

2018-02-11 Thread Md. Islam
Recently tcp_probe kernel module has been replaced by trace_event. Old tcp_probe had full=0 option where it only takes a snapshot only when congestion window is changed. However I did not find such functionality in trace_event. This is why I implemented this "conditional trace_event" where a