Re: [PATCH net-next 0/5] Route ICMPv6 errors with the flow when ECMP in use

2016-10-27 Thread Hannes Frederic Sowa
Hi, On 27.10.2016 17:23, David Miller wrote: > From: Jakub Sitnicki > Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:28:47 +0200 > >> However, for it to work IPv6 flow labels have to be same in both >> directions (i.e. reflected) or need to be chosen in a manner that >> ensures that the flow going in the opposite di

Re: [PATCH net-next 0/5] Route ICMPv6 errors with the flow when ECMP in use

2016-10-27 Thread David Miller
From: Jakub Sitnicki Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:28:47 +0200 > However, for it to work IPv6 flow labels have to be same in both > directions (i.e. reflected) or need to be chosen in a manner that > ensures that the flow going in the opposite direction would actually > be routed to a given path. My

[PATCH net-next 0/5] Route ICMPv6 errors with the flow when ECMP in use

2016-10-24 Thread Jakub Sitnicki
The motivation for this series is to route ICMPv6 error messages together with the flow they belong to when multipath routing is in use. It intends to bring the ECMP routing in IPv6 stack on par with IPv4. This enables the use of tools that rely on ICMP error messages such as traceroute and makes