From: Vivien Didelot
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 17:15:30 -0400
> DSA currently stores a phy_device pointer in each slave private
> structure. This requires to implement our own ethtool ksettings
> accessors and such.
>
> This patchset removes the private phy_device in favor of the one
> provided in
On 09/26/2017 02:15 PM, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> DSA currently stores a phy_device pointer in each slave private
> structure. This requires to implement our own ethtool ksettings
> accessors and such.
>
> This patchset removes the private phy_device in favor of the one
> provided in the net_device
DSA currently stores a phy_device pointer in each slave private
structure. This requires to implement our own ethtool ksettings
accessors and such.
This patchset removes the private phy_device in favor of the one
provided in the net_device structure, and thus allows us to use the
generic phy_ethto