On 3/29/18 2:29 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> Nice work, David. Ran various tests and didn't see any regressions.
>
> I know you already know this, but for the record, we plan to add
> accounting to KVD hash resources which will eventually allow us to
> return errors when resources are exceeded.
Than
From: David Ahern
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 18:21:54 -0700
> I wanted to revisit how resource overload is handled for hardware offload
> of FIB entries and rules. At the moment, the in-kernel fib notifier can
> tell a driver about a route or rule add, replace, and delete, but the
> notifier can not
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 06:21:54PM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> I wanted to revisit how resource overload is handled for hardware offload
> of FIB entries and rules. At the moment, the in-kernel fib notifier can
> tell a driver about a route or rule add, replace, and delete, but the
> notifier can n
I wanted to revisit how resource overload is handled for hardware offload
of FIB entries and rules. At the moment, the in-kernel fib notifier can
tell a driver about a route or rule add, replace, and delete, but the
notifier can not affect the action. Specifically, in the case of mlxsw
if a route o
