Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] net: sched: indirect tc block cb registration

2018-11-12 Thread Or Gerlitz
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 6:13 AM Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Sun, 11 Nov 2018 09:55:35 -0800 (PST), David Miller wrote: > > From: Jakub Kicinski > > Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 21:21:25 -0800 > > > > > John says: > > > > > > This patchset introduces an alternative to egdev offload by allowing a > > >

Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] net: sched: indirect tc block cb registration

2018-11-11 Thread Jakub Kicinski
On Sun, 11 Nov 2018 09:55:35 -0800 (PST), David Miller wrote: > From: Jakub Kicinski > Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 21:21:25 -0800 > > > John says: > > > > This patchset introduces an alternative to egdev offload by allowing a > > driver to register for block updates when an external device (e.g.

Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] net: sched: indirect tc block cb registration

2018-11-11 Thread David Miller
From: Jakub Kicinski Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 21:21:25 -0800 > John says: > > This patchset introduces an alternative to egdev offload by allowing a > driver to register for block updates when an external device (e.g. tunnel > netdev) is bound to a TC block. Drivers can track new netdevs or

[PATCH net-next 0/6] net: sched: indirect tc block cb registration

2018-11-09 Thread Jakub Kicinski
John says: This patchset introduces an alternative to egdev offload by allowing a driver to register for block updates when an external device (e.g. tunnel netdev) is bound to a TC block. Drivers can track new netdevs or register to existing ones to receive information on such events. Based on