From: Martin KaFai Lau
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 22:30:16 -0700
> test_bpf_obj_id() should not expect a non zero jited_prog_len
> to be returned by bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd() when
> net.core.bpf_jit_enable is 0.
>
> The patch checks for net.core.bpf_jit_enable and
> has different
On 6/8/17 10:30 PM, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
test_bpf_obj_id() should not expect a non zero jited_prog_len
to be returned by bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd() when
net.core.bpf_jit_enable is 0.
The patch checks for net.core.bpf_jit_enable and
has different expectation on jited_prog_len.
This patch
On 06/09/2017 07:30 AM, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
test_bpf_obj_id() should not expect a non zero jited_prog_len
to be returned by bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd() when
net.core.bpf_jit_enable is 0.
The patch checks for net.core.bpf_jit_enable and
has different expectation on jited_prog_len.
This patch
test_bpf_obj_id() should not expect a non zero jited_prog_len
to be returned by bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd() when
net.core.bpf_jit_enable is 0.
The patch checks for net.core.bpf_jit_enable and
has different expectation on jited_prog_len.
This patch also removes the pwd.h header which I forgot
to