Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] ldmvsw: add vio version and remote-mac to ethtool info

2017-06-21 Thread David Miller
From: Shannon Nelson Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 13:59:35 -0700 > On 6/21/2017 12:05 PM, David Miller wrote: >> Also, this is not at all an appropriate place to expose this. The >> "driver info" ethtool command is not a place to post per-connection >> or per-link information. > > I knew it was a bit

Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] ldmvsw: add vio version and remote-mac to ethtool info

2017-06-21 Thread Shannon Nelson
On 6/21/2017 12:05 PM, David Miller wrote: From: Shannon Nelson Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 09:09:53 -0700 In the ethtool -i output print the vio version and the remote-mac of the ldom that the vif device is serving as this vif info is not exposed elsewhere. The remote-mac address is most useful f

Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] ldmvsw: add vio version and remote-mac to ethtool info

2017-06-21 Thread David Miller
From: Shannon Nelson Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 09:09:53 -0700 > In the ethtool -i output print the vio version and the remote-mac > of the ldom that the vif device is serving as this vif info is > not exposed elsewhere. The remote-mac address is most useful for > tracking which client ldom is being

[PATCH net-next 1/2] ldmvsw: add vio version and remote-mac to ethtool info

2017-06-21 Thread Shannon Nelson
In the ethtool -i output print the vio version and the remote-mac of the ldom that the vif device is serving as this vif info is not exposed elsewhere. The remote-mac address is most useful for tracking which client ldom is being served by the vif. Orabug: 26316362 Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson