Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] sfc: Support setting rss_cpus to 'cores', 'packages' or 'hyperthreads'

2016-05-09 Thread David Miller
From: Edward Cree Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 13:00:01 +0100 > Should I resubmit patch 2/2 or is that one awful too? Sure.

Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] sfc: Support setting rss_cpus to 'cores', 'packages' or 'hyperthreads'

2016-05-09 Thread Edward Cree
On 06/05/16 20:38, David Miller wrote: > From: Edward Cree > Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 18:01:52 +0100 > >> These settings autoconfigure the number of RSS channels to match the number >> of >> CPUs present. >> >> Signed-off-by: Edward Cree > I can't

Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] sfc: Support setting rss_cpus to 'cores', 'packages' or 'hyperthreads'

2016-05-06 Thread David Miller
From: Edward Cree Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 18:01:52 +0100 > These settings autoconfigure the number of RSS channels to match the number of > CPUs present. > > Signed-off-by: Edward Cree I can't believe I allowed this 'rss_cpus' thing into the tree to

[PATCH net-next 1/2] sfc: Support setting rss_cpus to 'cores', 'packages' or 'hyperthreads'

2016-05-04 Thread Edward Cree
These settings autoconfigure the number of RSS channels to match the number of CPUs present. Signed-off-by: Edward Cree --- drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx.c | 143 - 1 file changed, 113 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) diff --git