On Tue, 2017-12-12 at 09:24 +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2017-12-07 07:06, sean.w...@mediatek.com wrote:
> > From: Sean Wang
> >
> > MT7530 can treat each port as either VLAN-unware port or VLAN-ware port
> Shouldn't that be VLAN-unaware/VLAN-aware (in the code as well)?
>
> - Felix
>
Hi,
On 2017-12-07 07:06, sean.w...@mediatek.com wrote:
> From: Sean Wang
>
> MT7530 can treat each port as either VLAN-unware port or VLAN-ware port
Shouldn't that be VLAN-unaware/VLAN-aware (in the code as well)?
- Felix
Hi, Andrew
All sounds reasonable. All will be fixed in the next version.
Sean
On Thu, 2017-12-07 at 16:24 +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > static void
> > +mt7530_port_set_vlan_unware(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port)
> > +{
> > + struct mt7530_priv *priv = ds->priv;
> > + int i;
> > +
> static void
> +mt7530_port_set_vlan_unware(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port)
> +{
> + struct mt7530_priv *priv = ds->priv;
> + int i;
> + bool all_user_ports_removed = true;
Hi Sean
Reverse Christmas tree please.
> +static int
> +mt7530_vlan_cmd(struct mt7530_priv *priv, enum mt753
From: Sean Wang
MT7530 can treat each port as either VLAN-unware port or VLAN-ware port
through the implementation of port matrix mode or port security mode on
the ingress port, respectively. On one hand, Each port has been acting as
the VLAN-unware one whenever the device is created in the initi
