On 18/10/13 (土) 16:48, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 18:36:48 +0900
Toshiaki Makita wrote:
Use existing atomic drop counter. Since drop path is really an
exceptional case here, I'm thinking atomic ops would not hurt the
performance.
Hmm... we try very hard not to add
On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 18:36:48 +0900
Toshiaki Makita wrote:
> Use existing atomic drop counter. Since drop path is really an
> exceptional case here, I'm thinking atomic ops would not hurt the
> performance.
Hmm... we try very hard not to add atomic ops to XDP code path. The
XDP_DROP case is also
Use existing atomic drop counter. Since drop path is really an
exceptional case here, I'm thinking atomic ops would not hurt the
performance.
XDP packets and bytes are not counted in ndo_xdp_xmit, but will be
accounted on rx side by the following commit.
Signed-off-by: Toshiaki Makita
---
