Le 20/04/2016 11:57, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 11:44 +0200, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
Le 20/04/2016 11:33, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
[snip]
How have you tested your patch exactly ?
As stated in the cover letter, I didn't test it.
You certainly can test this, by tweaking HAVE_EF
On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 11:44 +0200, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> Le 20/04/2016 11:33, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> [snip]
> > How have you tested your patch exactly ?
> As stated in the cover letter, I didn't test it.
You certainly can test this, by tweaking HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
and adding anot
Le 20/04/2016 11:33, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
[snip]
How have you tested your patch exactly ?
As stated in the cover letter, I didn't test it.
I guess David should have copied his original comment here.
-* The nlattr header is 4 bytes in size, that's why we test
-* if the skb->
On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 10:57 +0200, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> IS_ALIGN() returns true when the alignment is as expected. The pad
> attribute should be added only when the alignment is not 8.
>
> Fixes: 35c5845957c7 ("net: Add helpers for 64-bit aligning netlink
> attributes.")
> Signed-off-by: Nico
IS_ALIGN() returns true when the alignment is as expected. The pad
attribute should be added only when the alignment is not 8.
Fixes: 35c5845957c7 ("net: Add helpers for 64-bit aligning netlink attributes.")
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel
---
include/net/netlink.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 inser
