Wed, May 24, 2017 at 09:24:13PM CEST, kubak...@wp.pl wrote:
>On Wed, 24 May 2017 14:35:14 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> >+void nfp_devlink_port_unregister(struct nfp_port *port)
>> >+{
>> >+ /* Due to unpleasant lock ordering we may see the port go away before
>> >+* we have fully probed.
>>
On Wed, 24 May 2017 14:35:14 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >+void nfp_devlink_port_unregister(struct nfp_port *port)
> >+{
> >+/* Due to unpleasant lock ordering we may see the port go away before
> >+ * we have fully probed.
>
> Could you elaborate on this a bit more please?
It's partiall
Tue, May 23, 2017 at 05:12:45PM CEST, jakub.kicin...@netronome.com wrote:
>Extend nfp_port to contain devlink_port structures. Register the
>ports to allow users inspecting device ports.
>
>Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski
>Reviewed-by: Simon Horman
>---
[...]
>+void nfp_devlink_port_unregister(s
Extend nfp_port to contain devlink_port structures. Register the
ports to allow users inspecting device ports.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman
---
drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_devlink.c | 49 +++
drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_main
