On 4 December 2017 at 15:50, David Miller wrote:
> From: Ard Biesheuvel
> Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 15:46:55 +
>
>> On 4 December 2017 at 15:24, David Miller wrote:
>>> From: Heiner Kallweit
>>> Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 23:55:15 +0100
>>>
After commits c974bdbc3e "net: phy: Use threaded IRQ,
From: Ard Biesheuvel
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 15:46:55 +
> On 4 December 2017 at 15:24, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Heiner Kallweit
>> Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 23:55:15 +0100
>>
>>> After commits c974bdbc3e "net: phy: Use threaded IRQ, to allow IRQ from
>>> sleeping devices" and 664fcf123a30 "n
On 4 December 2017 at 15:24, David Miller wrote:
> From: Heiner Kallweit
> Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 23:55:15 +0100
>
>> After commits c974bdbc3e "net: phy: Use threaded IRQ, to allow IRQ from
>> sleeping devices" and 664fcf123a30 "net: phy: Threaded interrupts allow
>> some simplification" all rele
From: Heiner Kallweit
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 23:55:15 +0100
> After commits c974bdbc3e "net: phy: Use threaded IRQ, to allow IRQ from
> sleeping devices" and 664fcf123a30 "net: phy: Threaded interrupts allow
> some simplification" all relevant code pieces run in process context
> anyway and I don
After commits c974bdbc3e "net: phy: Use threaded IRQ, to allow IRQ from
sleeping devices" and 664fcf123a30 "net: phy: Threaded interrupts allow
some simplification" all relevant code pieces run in process context
anyway and I don't think we need the disabling of interrupts any longer.
Interestingl
