Currently, when an interface is released from a bridge via
ioctl(), we get a RTM_DELLINK event through netlink:
Deleted 2: dummy0: mtu 1500 master bridge0 state
UNKNOWN
link/ether 6e:23:c2:54:3a:b3
Userspace has to interpret that as a removal from the bridge, not as a
complete removal of th
From: Vincent Bernat
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2017 16:18:33 +0200
David, I am CC:'ing you because you've done work in this area over the
past year. I'm applying this patch, it's been sitting since the 16th
and likes entirely correct to me. But if you have objections just let
me know.
> Currently, whe
On 9/20/17 3:09 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Vincent Bernat
> Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2017 16:18:33 +0200
>
> David, I am CC:'ing you because you've done work in this area over the
> past year. I'm applying this patch, it's been sitting since the 16th
> and likes entirely correct to me. But if you
❦ 20 septembre 2017 15:57 -0600, David Ahern :
> The DELLINK is for AF_BRIDGE family (ifi_family). Adding family to
> print_linkinfo and running the monitor I get:
>
>
> [LINK]family 0: 35: dummy1: mtu 1500 qdisc
> noqueue master br0 state UNKNOWN group default
> link/ether d6:c3:73:86:3c:7
From: Vincent Bernat
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 00:12:53 +0200
> ❦ 20 septembre 2017 15:57 -0600, David Ahern :
>
>> The DELLINK is for AF_BRIDGE family (ifi_family). Adding family to
>> print_linkinfo and running the monitor I get:
>>
>>
>> [LINK]family 0: 35: dummy1: mtu 1500 qdisc
>> noqueue m
On Wed, 20 Sep 2017 15:57:16 -0600
David Ahern wrote:
> On 9/20/17 3:09 PM, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Vincent Bernat
> > Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2017 16:18:33 +0200
> >
> > David, I am CC:'ing you because you've done work in this area over the
> > past year. I'm applying this patch, it's been si
❦ 20 septembre 2017 16:21 -0700, Stephen Hemminger
:
> The one concern is that ports added or removed through ioctl should
> cause same events as doing the same thing via netlink. Some users use
> brctl (ioctl) and others use newer bridge (netlink) API.
I'll make a third iteration to have the
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:04 AM, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 20 septembre 2017 16:21 -0700, Stephen Hemminger
> :
>
>> The one concern is that ports added or removed through ioctl should
>> cause same events as doing the same thing via netlink. Some users use
>> brctl (ioctl) and others use newer
❦ 21 septembre 2017 08:09 -0700, Roopa Prabhu :
>>> The one concern is that ports added or removed through ioctl should
>>> cause same events as doing the same thing via netlink. Some users use
>>> brctl (ioctl) and others use newer bridge (netlink) API.
>>
>> I'll make a third iteration to have
