On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 12:41 AM, Nicolas Dichtel
wrote:
> Le 17/11/2016 à 07:32, Cong Wang a écrit :
> [snip]
>> since Nicolas' patch doesn't even compile...
> It's always surprising how agressive you are, really :(
> Can you show me the compilation error of this patch (we are talking about the
Le 17/11/2016 à 07:32, Cong Wang a écrit :
[snip]
> since Nicolas' patch doesn't even compile...
It's always surprising how agressive you are, really :(
Can you show me the compilation error of this patch (we are talking about the v2
patch here)?
Le 17/11/2016 à 05:17, David Miller a écrit :
[snip]
> Indeed, this looks cleaner, Nicolas?
Yes, I agree. Cong already sent a v3 of my patch, let's apply it.
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 8:17 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Cong Wang
> Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 09:29:29 -0800
>
>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 1:49 AM, Nicolas Dichtel
>> wrote:
>>> diff --git a/net/core/net_namespace.c b/net/core/net_namespace.c
>>> index f61c0e02a413..63f65387f4e1 100644
>>> ---
From: Cong Wang
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 09:29:29 -0800
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 1:49 AM, Nicolas Dichtel
> wrote:
>> diff --git a/net/core/net_namespace.c b/net/core/net_namespace.c
>> index f61c0e02a413..63f65387f4e1 100644
>> --- a/net/core/net_namespace.c
>> +++ b/net/core/net_namespace.c
>>
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 1:49 AM, Nicolas Dichtel
wrote:
> diff --git a/net/core/net_namespace.c b/net/core/net_namespace.c
> index f61c0e02a413..63f65387f4e1 100644
> --- a/net/core/net_namespace.c
> +++ b/net/core/net_namespace.c
> @@ -159,6 +159,9 @@ static int alloc_netid(struct net *net, struc
Andrei reports the following kmemleak error:
unreferenced object 0x91badb543950 (size 2096):
comm "kworker/u4:0", pid 6, jiffies 4295152553 (age 28.418s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 cb 5f df ba 91 ff ff .._.
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
