On 04/26/2016 12:55 AM, David Rivshin (Allworx) wrote:
On Mon, 25 Apr 2016 22:12:20 +0300
Grygorii Strashko wrote:
On 04/22/2016 06:45 PM, David Rivshin (Allworx) wrote:
On Fri, 22 Apr 2016 16:03:34 +0300
Grygorii Strashko wrote:
On
On Mon, 25 Apr 2016 22:12:20 +0300
Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> On 04/22/2016 06:45 PM, David Rivshin (Allworx) wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Apr 2016 16:03:34 +0300
> > Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> >
> >> On 04/21/2016 09:26 PM, David Rivshin
On 04/22/2016 06:45 PM, David Rivshin (Allworx) wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Apr 2016 16:03:34 +0300
> Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>
>> On 04/21/2016 09:26 PM, David Rivshin (Allworx) wrote:
>>> From: David Rivshin
>>>
>>> The phy-handle, phy_id, and
On Fri, 22 Apr 2016 16:03:34 +0300
Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> On 04/21/2016 09:26 PM, David Rivshin (Allworx) wrote:
> > From: David Rivshin
> >
> > The phy-handle, phy_id, and fixed-link properties are mutually exclusive,
> > and only one need
On 04/21/2016 09:26 PM, David Rivshin (Allworx) wrote:
> From: David Rivshin
>
> The phy-handle, phy_id, and fixed-link properties are mutually exclusive,
> and only one need be specified. However if phy-handle was specified, an
> error message would complain about the lack
From: David Rivshin
The phy-handle, phy_id, and fixed-link properties are mutually exclusive,
and only one need be specified. However if phy-handle was specified, an
error message would complain about the lack of phy_id or fixed-link.
Also, if phy-handle was specified and