Re: [PATCH net v3 4/5] dt: cpsw: phy-handle, phy_id, and fixed-link are mutually exclusive

2016-05-03 Thread Rob Herring
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 09:42:47PM -0400, David Rivshin (Allworx) wrote: > From: David Rivshin > > The phy-handle, phy_id, and fixed-link properties are mutually exclusive, > and only one need be specified. Make this clear in the binding doc. > > Also mark the phy_id

Re: [PATCH net v3 4/5] dt: cpsw: phy-handle, phy_id, and fixed-link are mutually exclusive

2016-04-28 Thread Mugunthan V N
On Thursday 28 April 2016 07:12 AM, David Rivshin (Allworx) wrote: > From: David Rivshin > > The phy-handle, phy_id, and fixed-link properties are mutually exclusive, > and only one need be specified. Make this clear in the binding doc. > > Also mark the phy_id property as

[PATCH net v3 4/5] dt: cpsw: phy-handle, phy_id, and fixed-link are mutually exclusive

2016-04-27 Thread David Rivshin (Allworx)
From: David Rivshin The phy-handle, phy_id, and fixed-link properties are mutually exclusive, and only one need be specified. Make this clear in the binding doc. Also mark the phy_id property as deprecated, as phy-handle should be used instead. Signed-off-by: David