Hi Eric,
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 06:04:30AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > If these 4 bytes matter, why not use
> > cmpq with an immediate value instead, which saves 2 extra bytes ? :
> >
> > - the mov above is 11 bytes total :
> >
> >0: 48 8b 84 d6 78 56 34mov0x12345678(%rsi,%rdx,
On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 10:39 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [ replaced stable@ and greg@ by netdev@ as my question below is not
> relevant to stable ]
>
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 02:48:54AM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>> From: Eric Dumazet
>>
>> [ upstream commit 84ccac6e7854ebbfb56d2fc6
Hi,
[ replaced stable@ and greg@ by netdev@ as my question below is not
relevant to stable ]
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 02:48:54AM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet
>
> [ upstream commit 84ccac6e7854ebbfb56d2fc6d5bef9be49bb304c ]
>
> Saves 4 bytes replacing following instructio
