Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Avoid link dependency of dlm on sctp module

On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 01:59:18PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Neil Horman > Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 09:57:14 -0400 > > > Series > > Acked-by: Neil Horman > > I don't like this at all. > > I know it's a pain in the ass to have this dependency on SCTP, but > calling exported functions is

Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Avoid link dependency of dlm on sctp module

From: Neil Horman Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 09:57:14 -0400 > Series > Acked-by: Neil Horman I don't like this at all. I know it's a pain in the ass to have this dependency on SCTP, but calling exported functions is absolutely the right way to handle this kind of situation. -- To unsubscribe from

Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Avoid link dependency of dlm on sctp module

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 02:13:23PM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to remove a direct dependency of dlm module on sctp one. > Currently dlm code is calling sctp_do_peeloff() directly and this call > only is causing the load of sctp module together with dlm. For that, we

[PATCH v2 0/2] Avoid link dependency of dlm on sctp module

Hi, I'm trying to remove a direct dependency of dlm module on sctp one. Currently dlm code is calling sctp_do_peeloff() directly and this call only is causing the load of sctp module together with dlm. For that, we have basically 3 options: - Doing a module split on dlm - which I'm avoiding beca