Hi Cong,
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:24:24AM -0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> These two functions are called in sendmsg path, and the
> 'len' is passed from user-space, so we should not allow
> malicious users to OOM kernel on purpose.
>
> Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov
> Cc: Lauro
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 10:45 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Cong Wang
> Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 10:41:29 -0800
>
>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
>>> These two functions are called in sendmsg path,
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 10:41:29AM -0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
> > These two functions are called in sendmsg path, and the
> > 'len' is passed from user-space, so we should not allow
> > malicious users to OOM kernel on
From: Cong Wang
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 10:41:29 -0800
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
>> These two functions are called in sendmsg path, and the
>> 'len' is passed from user-space, so we should not allow
>> malicious users
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
> These two functions are called in sendmsg path, and the
> 'len' is passed from user-space, so we should not allow
> malicious users to OOM kernel on purpose.
>
> Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov
> Cc:
Hi Cong
On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 6:46 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 11:24 -0800, Cong Wang wrote:
>> These two functions are called in sendmsg path, and the
>> 'len' is passed from user-space, so we should not allow
>> malicious users to OOM kernel on
These two functions are called in sendmsg path, and the
'len' is passed from user-space, so we should not allow
malicious users to OOM kernel on purpose.
Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov
Cc: Lauro Ramos Venancio
Cc: Aloisio Almeida Jr
On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 11:24 -0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> These two functions are called in sendmsg path, and the
> 'len' is passed from user-space, so we should not allow
> malicious users to OOM kernel on purpose.
>
> Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov
> Cc: Lauro Ramos Venancio