Thanks. I got it. I will resubmit v3 patch!
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Alexei Starovoitov
wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 11:29:19PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>> On 02/03/2017 10:10 PM, William Tu wrote:
>> >Hi Alexei,
>> >
>> >why it is bogus? on my system, it fails without the patch a
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 11:29:19PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 02/03/2017 10:10 PM, William Tu wrote:
> >Hi Alexei,
> >
> >why it is bogus? on my system, it fails without the patch applied.
> >
> >--William
> >
> >On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Alexei Starovoitov
> > wrote:
> >>On Fri, Feb
On 02/03/2017 10:10 PM, William Tu wrote:
Hi Alexei,
why it is bogus? on my system, it fails without the patch applied.
--William
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Alexei Starovoitov
wrote:
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 09:22:45AM -0800, William Tu wrote:
The patch fixes the case when adding a zer
Hi Alexei,
why it is bogus? on my system, it fails without the patch applied.
--William
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Alexei Starovoitov
wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 09:22:45AM -0800, William Tu wrote:
>> The patch fixes the case when adding a zero value to the packet
>> pointer. The ve
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 09:22:45AM -0800, William Tu wrote:
> The patch fixes the case when adding a zero value to the packet
> pointer. The verifer reports the following error:
> [...]
> R0=imm0,min_value=0,max_value=0
> R1=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=4)
> R2=pkt_end R3=fp-12
> R4=imm4,min
[ please keep us Cc'ed ;) ]
On 02/03/2017 06:22 PM, William Tu wrote:
The patch fixes the case when adding a zero value to the packet
pointer. The verifer reports the following error:
[...]
R0=imm0,min_value=0,max_value=0
R1=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=4)
R2=pkt_end R3=fp-12
R4=imm4
The patch fixes the case when adding a zero value to the packet
pointer. The verifer reports the following error:
[...]
R0=imm0,min_value=0,max_value=0
R1=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=4)
R2=pkt_end R3=fp-12
R4=imm4,min_value=4,max_value=4
R5=pkt(id=0,off=4,r=4)
269: (bf) r2 = r0 //
