Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] liquidio: improve UDP TX performance

2017-02-22 Thread Eric Dumazet
On Tue, 2017-02-21 at 22:57 -0800, Felix Manlunas wrote: > Tom Herbert wrote on Tue [2017-Feb-21 15:27:54 -0800]: > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Felix Manlunas > > wrote: > > > From: VSR Burru > > > > > >

Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] liquidio: improve UDP TX performance

2017-02-21 Thread Felix Manlunas
Tom Herbert wrote on Tue [2017-Feb-21 15:27:54 -0800]: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Felix Manlunas > wrote: > > From: VSR Burru > > > > Improve UDP TX performance by: > > * reducing the ring size from 2K to

Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] liquidio: improve UDP TX performance

2017-02-21 Thread Tom Herbert
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Felix Manlunas wrote: > From: VSR Burru > > Improve UDP TX performance by: > * reducing the ring size from 2K to 512 It looks like liquidio supports BQL. Is that not effective here? Thanks, Tom > *

Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] liquidio: improve UDP TX performance

2017-02-21 Thread Rick Jones
On 02/21/2017 01:09 PM, Felix Manlunas wrote: From: VSR Burru Improve UDP TX performance by: * reducing the ring size from 2K to 512 * replacing the numerous streaming DMA allocations for info buffers and gather lists with one large consistent DMA allocation

[PATCH v2 net-next] liquidio: improve UDP TX performance

2017-02-21 Thread Felix Manlunas
From: VSR Burru Improve UDP TX performance by: * reducing the ring size from 2K to 512 * replacing the numerous streaming DMA allocations for info buffers and gather lists with one large consistent DMA allocation per ring Netperf benchmark numbers before and