Hi Eric,
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 14:27:13 -0700 Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> Since this runs lockless, another cpu might change m->tcfm_eaction in
> the middle, and you could call dev_queue_xmit(skb2) while the skb2 was
> prepared for the opposite action.
Well, seem members of 'struct tcf_mirred' are ou
On Wed, 2016-09-28 at 00:42 +0300, Shmulik Ladkani wrote:
> Thanks Eric.
>
> I assume adding a READ_ONCE(m->tcfm_eaction) at beggining of section,
> and using the read value, will solve this specific inconsistency?
Sure, adding a READ_ONCE() might work, if done properly ;)
Hi,
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 14:27:13 -0700 Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 23:59 +0300, Shmulik Ladkani wrote:
> > Up until now, 'action mirred' supported only egress actions (either
> > TCA_EGRESS_REDIR or TCA_EGRESS_MIRROR).
> >
> > This patch implements the corresponding ingress actio
On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 23:59 +0300, Shmulik Ladkani wrote:
> Up until now, 'action mirred' supported only egress actions (either
> TCA_EGRESS_REDIR or TCA_EGRESS_MIRROR).
>
> This patch implements the corresponding ingress actions
> TCA_INGRESS_REDIR and TCA_INGRESS_MIRROR.
> - if (m-
Up until now, 'action mirred' supported only egress actions (either
TCA_EGRESS_REDIR or TCA_EGRESS_MIRROR).
This patch implements the corresponding ingress actions
TCA_INGRESS_REDIR and TCA_INGRESS_MIRROR.
This allows attaching filters whose target is to hand matching skbs into
the rx processing
