From: Neil Horman
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 13:32:57 -0400
> Based on a request raised on the sctp devel list, there is a need to
> augment the sctp_peeloff operation while specifying the O_CLOEXEC and
> O_NONBLOCK flags (simmilar to the socket syscall). Since modifying the
> SCTP_SOCKOPT_PEELOFF s
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 01:32:57PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> Based on a request raised on the sctp devel list, there is a need to
> augment the sctp_peeloff operation while specifying the O_CLOEXEC and
> O_NONBLOCK flags (simmilar to the socket syscall). Since modifying the
> SCTP_SOCKOPT_PEELOF
Based on a request raised on the sctp devel list, there is a need to
augment the sctp_peeloff operation while specifying the O_CLOEXEC and
O_NONBLOCK flags (simmilar to the socket syscall). Since modifying the
SCTP_SOCKOPT_PEELOFF socket option would break user space ABI for existing
programs, thi
