On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 13:52 +0100, Romain Perier wrote:
> > I also wonder if you've in fact converted all of the
> > pci_pool struct and function uses why a new checkpatch
> > test is needed at all.
>
> That's just to avoid futures mistakes/uses.
When all instances and macro definitions are remo
Hello,
Le 27/02/2017 à 13:38, Joe Perches a écrit :
> On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 13:26 +0100, Romain Perier wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>> Le 27/02/2017 à 12:22, Peter Senna Tschudin a écrit :
>>> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 08:24:25PM +0100, Romain Perier wrote:
pci_pool_*() functions should be replaced
On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 13:26 +0100, Romain Perier wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> Le 27/02/2017 à 12:22, Peter Senna Tschudin a écrit :
> > On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 08:24:25PM +0100, Romain Perier wrote:
> > > pci_pool_*() functions should be replaced by the corresponding functions
> > > in the DMA pool API.
Hello,
Le 27/02/2017 à 12:22, Peter Senna Tschudin a écrit :
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 08:24:25PM +0100, Romain Perier wrote:
>> pci_pool_*() functions should be replaced by the corresponding functions
>> in the DMA pool API. This adds support to check for use of these pci
>> functions and displa
On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 12:22 +0100, Peter Senna Tschudin wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 08:24:25PM +0100, Romain Perier wrote:
> > pci_pool_*() functions should be replaced by the corresponding functions
> > in the DMA pool API. This adds support to check for use of these pci
> > functions and dis
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 08:24:25PM +0100, Romain Perier wrote:
> pci_pool_*() functions should be replaced by the corresponding functions
> in the DMA pool API. This adds support to check for use of these pci
> functions and display a warning when it is the case.
>
I guess Joe Perches did sent som
