Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] posix-timers: make it configurable

On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Tue, 8 Nov 2016, John Stultz wrote: > >> One spot of concern is that the >> tools/testing/selftests/timers/posix_timers.c test hangs testing >> virtual itimers. Looking through the code I'm not seeing where an >>

Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] posix-timers: make it configurable

On Tue, 8 Nov 2016, John Stultz wrote: > One spot of concern is that the > tools/testing/selftests/timers/posix_timers.c test hangs testing > virtual itimers. Looking through the code I'm not seeing where an > error case is missed. > > The strace looks like: > ... > write(1, "Testing posix

Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] posix-timers: make it configurable

On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > Some embedded systems have no use for them. This removes about > 22KB from the kernel binary size when configured out. > > Corresponding syscalls are routed to a stub logging the attempt to > use those syscalls

[PATCH v3 4/4] posix-timers: make it configurable

Some embedded systems have no use for them. This removes about 22KB from the kernel binary size when configured out. Corresponding syscalls are routed to a stub logging the attempt to use those syscalls which should be enough of a clue if they were disabled without proper consideration. They