On 2016年05月30日 23:37, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 05:59:33PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2016年05月23日 18:43, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
This is in response to the proposal by Jason to make tun
rx packet queue lockless using a circular buffer.
My testing seems to show
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 05:59:33PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2016年05月23日 18:43, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >This is in response to the proposal by Jason to make tun
> >rx packet queue lockless using a circular buffer.
> >My testing seems to show that at least for the common usecase
>
On 2016年05月23日 18:43, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
This is in response to the proposal by Jason to make tun
rx packet queue lockless using a circular buffer.
My testing seems to show that at least for the common usecase
in networking, which isn't lockless, circular buffer
with indices does not
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 06:31:46AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 13:43 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > This is in response to the proposal by Jason to make tun
> > rx packet queue lockless using a circular buffer.
> > My testing seems to show that at least for the common
On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 13:43 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> This is in response to the proposal by Jason to make tun
> rx packet queue lockless using a circular buffer.
> My testing seems to show that at least for the common usecase
> in networking, which isn't lockless, circular buffer
> with
This is in response to the proposal by Jason to make tun
rx packet queue lockless using a circular buffer.
My testing seems to show that at least for the common usecase
in networking, which isn't lockless, circular buffer
with indices does not perform that well, because
each index access causes a
