On 12/6/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday, 6. December 2006 02:44, you wrote:
> FYI...after latest round of merges, that patch that I've been carrying
> in the pending branch of wireless-2.6 no longer applies.
>
> John
Ok, I'm waiting for Dmitry' feedback... (hello,
On Wednesday, 6. December 2006 02:44, you wrote:
> FYI...after latest round of merges, that patch that I've been carrying
> in the pending branch of wireless-2.6 no longer applies.
>
> John
Ok, I'm waiting for Dmitry' feedback... (hello, where're you ;) ?)
Christian
-
To unsubscribe from this li
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 11:47:49AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sunday, 26. November 2006 06:27, you wrote:
> >
> > Sorry, still need the second "ifup" to bring the card up after plugging
> > it in. ping -f looks good however, I will try to stress it more and will
> > report if I see anythi
On Saturday 25 November 2006 11:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Saturday, 25. November 2006 06:39, you wrote:
> > Ok, it looks like the patch changed the order of netdevice registration vs.
> > requesting firmware. My scripts are trying to set ESSID and keys before
> > firmware even gets loaded i
Am Samstag, 18. November 2006 05:27 schrieben Sie:
>
> OK, i'll try installing kismet on another laptop. For now that's what I
> have from iwevent:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# cat iwevents.bad
> 21:30:52.185823 eth1 Set Mode:Managed
where's Set Encryption key:------**
On Friday 17 November 2006 15:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > The card is WG511 talking to netgear WGR614 router. I am using WEP128
> > with shared keys. Router is set to be "g" only. The OS is Fedora Core
> > 3 (I swear I will upgrade :) ), just recompiled wireless tools from
> > sources in F
>
> Btw, it usually locks up under heavyish load. I.e. if I just ssh into
> my devel box and code in vi it will stay jsut fine for hours. But
> FTPing stuff over quite often locks it up.
k, I've seen this phenomenon too, but on my a PCI card.
Alright, when you come home, you should check the sysl
On 11/17/06, Dmitry Torokhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/17/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > The reason for me trying the patch is that the card locks up
> > frequently (the amber transmission light turns on stays this way).
>
> Do you get any fancy "mgt timeout ..."
On 11/17/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The reason for me trying the patch is that the card locks up
> frequently (the amber transmission light turns on stays this way).
Do you get any fancy "mgt timeout ..." or something in dmesg, when
the cards locks up? (include one, if
>
> The card is WG511 talking to netgear WGR614 router. I am using WEP128
> with shared keys. Router is set to be "g" only. The OS is Fedora Core
> 3 (I swear I will upgrade :) ), just recompiled wireless tools from
> sources in FC6.
>
> > for debugging:
> > dmesg & iwevent output would be nice...
On 11/17/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am Freitag, 17. November 2006 06:42 schrieben Sie:
> >
> > No, more that my card doesn't successfully associate at all even
> > _without_ the patch on unencrypted or WEP APs; I just can't test it,
> > since my card seems to be broken...
>
Am Freitag, 17. November 2006 06:42 schrieben Sie:
> >
> > No, more that my card doesn't successfully associate at all even
> > _without_ the patch on unencrypted or WEP APs; I just can't test it,
> > since my card seems to be broken...
>
> FWIW I applied the patch to tonight pull form Linus's tree
On Friday 10 November 2006 09:42, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 18:16 -0500, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On 11/9/06, Luis R. Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 11/9/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Am Mittwoch, 8. November 2006 01:39 schrieben Sie:
On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 18:16 -0500, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On 11/9/06, Luis R. Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 11/9/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Am Mittwoch, 8. November 2006 01:39 schrieben Sie:
> > > > On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 01:41:46PM -0500, Luis R. Rodr
On 11/9/06, Luis R. Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/9/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 8. November 2006 01:39 schrieben Sie:
> > On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 01:41:46PM -0500, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > > On 11/3/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
On 11/9/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 8. November 2006 01:39 schrieben Sie:
> On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 01:41:46PM -0500, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On 11/3/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >yes, especially mgt_commit_list caused alot headaches,
Am Mittwoch, 8. November 2006 01:39 schrieben Sie:
> On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 01:41:46PM -0500, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On 11/3/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >yes, especially mgt_commit_list caused alot headaches, until I removed
> > >DOT11_OID_PSM from the cache list.
>
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 01:41:46PM -0500, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On 11/3/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >yes, especially mgt_commit_list caused alot headaches, until I removed
> >DOT11_OID_PSM from the cache list.
> >Now, I can "hammer" it with ping -f for hours.
>
> nice,
On 11/3/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am Freitag, 3. November 2006 17:06 schrieben Sie:
> On 11/3/06, Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 11:05 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 15:17 -0500, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > > > On
On 11/3/06, Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 11:05 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 15:17 -0500, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On 10/29/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > This patch completes WPA/RSN with TKIP support for all fullm
On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 11:05 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 15:17 -0500, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On 10/29/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > This patch completes WPA/RSN with TKIP support for all fullmac prism54
> > > cards.
> > > I removed all parts whi
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 15:17 -0500, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On 10/29/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This patch completes WPA/RSN with TKIP support for all fullmac prism54
> > cards.
> > I removed all parts which are not relevant for wpa_supplicant (managed
> > mode).
>
>
On Sun, 2006-10-29 at 14:35 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This patch completes WPA/RSN with TKIP support for all fullmac prism54 cards.
> I removed all parts which are not relevant for wpa_supplicant (managed mode).
>
> you can connect to your WLAN with:
> wpa_supplicant -Dwext -c{WPA_CONF} -
On 10/29/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This patch completes WPA/RSN with TKIP support for all fullmac prism54 cards.
I removed all parts which are not relevant for wpa_supplicant (managed mode).
This is great effort and thanks for it! My only concern with the patch
is breakin
On Sun, 2006-10-29 at 14:35 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> +#define MAC2STR(a) (a)[0], (a)[1], (a)[2], (a)[3], (a)[4], (a)[5]:
> +#define MACSTR "%02x: %02x:%02x:%02x:%02x:%02x"
such defines should exist already in ieee80211 headers.
> - /* Update our wireless stats, but do not schedul
25 matches
Mail list logo