From: marcelo.leit...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 12:31:17 -0200
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:58:10AM -0500, David Miller wrote:
>> If this is "so critical" for end to end communication, why the heck
>> do you not see __packed sprinkled all over our definitions for IPV4,
>> IPV6, TCP, UDP, et
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:58:10AM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> If this is "so critical" for end to end communication, why the heck
> do you not see __packed sprinkled all over our definitions for IPV4,
> IPV6, TCP, UDP, etc. headers?
>
> Do you know why? Because it's completely unnecessary...
B
From: marcelo.leit...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 14:14:58 -0200
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 11:00:47AM -0500, David Miller wrote:
>> I will not accept __packed being used unless it is absolutely, provably,
>> the only way to solve a particular problem. And when that does happen,
>> I am going
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 11:00:47AM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: "'Marcelo Ricardo Leitner'"
> Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 10:36:28 -0200
>
> > So, no padding. A field just after the other, which is what we want on a
> > network header.
>
> It isn't necessary!
>
> Show me a case where it is req
From: "'Marcelo Ricardo Leitner'"
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 10:36:28 -0200
> So, no padding. A field just after the other, which is what we want on a
> network header.
It isn't necessary!
Show me a case where it is required when you use properly fixed sized
types and a proper ordering of the struc
From: David Laight
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 12:26:12 +
> From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner > Sent: 20 January 2017 16:39
>> To: David Laight
>> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 02:50:01PM +, David Laight wrote:
>> > From: Xin Long
>> > > Sent: 19 January 2017 17:19
>> > > This patch is to define Add Inc
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 12:26:12PM +, David Laight wrote:
> From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner > Sent: 20 January 2017 16:39
> > To: David Laight
> > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 02:50:01PM +, David Laight wrote:
> > > From: Xin Long
> > > > Sent: 19 January 2017 17:19
> > > > This patch is to define
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner > Sent: 20 January 2017 16:39
> To: David Laight
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 02:50:01PM +, David Laight wrote:
> > From: Xin Long
> > > Sent: 19 January 2017 17:19
> > > This patch is to define Add Incoming/Outgoing Streams Request
> > > Parameter described in rfc652
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 02:50:01PM +, David Laight wrote:
> From: Xin Long
> > Sent: 19 January 2017 17:19
> > This patch is to define Add Incoming/Outgoing Streams Request
> > Parameter described in rfc6525 section 4.5 and 4.6. They can
> > be in one same chunk trunk as rfc6525 section 3.1-7 d
From: Xin Long
> Sent: 19 January 2017 17:19
> This patch is to define Add Incoming/Outgoing Streams Request
> Parameter described in rfc6525 section 4.5 and 4.6. They can
> be in one same chunk trunk as rfc6525 section 3.1-7 describes,
> so make them in one function.
...
> +struct sctp_strreset_ad
This patch is to define Add Incoming/Outgoing Streams Request
Parameter described in rfc6525 section 4.5 and 4.6. They can
be in one same chunk trunk as rfc6525 section 3.1-7 describes,
so make them in one function.
Signed-off-by: Xin Long
---
include/linux/sctp.h | 7 +++
include/net/s
11 matches
Mail list logo
