Hi,
Updated as per James' comment.
Catherine
---
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This patch implements an application of the LSM-IPSec networking
controls whereby an application can determine the label of the
security association its TCP or UDP sockets are currently connected to
via getsockopt and th
Hi,
Updated as per Herbert's comment.
Catherine
---
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This patch implements an application of the LSM-IPSec networking
controls whereby an application can determine the label of the
security association its TCP or UDP sockets are currently connected to
via getsockopt and
On Mon, 6 Feb 2006, Catherine Zhang wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Updated as per James' comment.
Looks good to me.
Acked-by: James Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
James Morris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PRO
Catherine,
My mailer may have been acting up, but the from header of your email had
[EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED] :-)
> diff -puN security/selinux/hooks.c~lsm-secpeer security/selinux/hooks.c
> --- linux-2.6.16-rc1/security/selinux/hooks.c~lsm-secpeer 2006-02-01
> 00:55:23.00
Joy,
Thanks for your comment and sorry for the delay. Did you mean a
separate error code for 'null' context? The current code catches the
case when the sid is SECSID_NULL, and returns ENOPROTOOPT. The
question is whether we want to create a different error code for this
case. Any suggestions?
On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 12:12:31PM -0500, Catherine Zhang wrote:
>
> Updated as per James' comment.
I don't quite understand how one actually uses this but it looks
correct technically :)
> diff -puN security/dummy.c~lsm-secpeer security/dummy.c
> --- linux-2.6.16-rc1/security/dummy.c~lsm-secpee
On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 01:30 -0500, Catherine Zhang wrote:
> Joy,
>
> Thanks for your comment and sorry for the delay. Did you mean a
> separate error code for 'null' context? The current code catches the
> case when the sid is SECSID_NULL, and returns ENOPROTOOPT. The
> question is whether we w
Catherine Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> This patch implements an application of the LSM-IPSec networking
> controls whereby an application can determine the label of the
> security association its TCP or UDP sockets are currently connected to
> via getsockopt an
From: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 11:33:19 +1100
> Catherine Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > This patch implements an application of the LSM-IPSec networking
> > controls whereby an application can determine the label of the
> >
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, David S. Miller wrote:
> I thought James still had some objections?
> James?
Is this the patch from a few weeks back? If so, it needs updating to
support Unix datagram.
- James
--
James Morris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscri
Hi, James,
I am working on a separate patch for Unix datagram, instead of mixing the
two into one patch.
thanks,
Catherine
James Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 03/08/2006 09:56:33 PM:
> On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, David S. Miller wrote:
>
> > I thought James still had some objections?
> > James?
From: Xiaolan Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 22:02:31 -0500
> I am working on a separate patch for Unix datagram, instead of mixing the
> two into one patch.
James, is this Ok with you?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message
From: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 11:33:19 +1100
> Acked-by: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Dave, perhaps we should queue this for 2.6.17?
Applied, thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECT
13 matches
Mail list logo
