From: Cong Wang
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 10:15:36 -0700
> According to the new locking rule, we have to take tcf_lock
> for both ->init() and ->dump(), as RTNL will be removed.
> However, it is missing for act_connmark.
>
> Cc: Vlad Buslov
> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang
Applied.
On Wed 29 Aug 2018 at 17:15, Cong Wang wrote:
> According to the new locking rule, we have to take tcf_lock
> for both ->init() and ->dump(), as RTNL will be removed.
> However, it is missing for act_connmark.
Thank you for finding and fixing this!
>
> Cc: Vlad Buslov
> Signed-off-by: Cong
According to the new locking rule, we have to take tcf_lock
for both ->init() and ->dump(), as RTNL will be removed.
However, it is missing for act_connmark.
Cc: Vlad Buslov
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang
---
net/sched/act_connmark.c | 11 ---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
