Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/13] d80211: allow WDS remote to by set by WE

2006-03-16 Thread Jiri Benc
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 15:58:45 -0800, Jouni Malinen wrote: Neither did I at first, but after some debugging, I would assume that you actually meant to return from ieee80211_ioctl_siwap() if the previous address is identical to the new one, not if it has changed.. In other words: [...] -

Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/13] d80211: allow WDS remote to by set by WE

2006-03-15 Thread Jouni Malinen
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 04:44:21PM +0100, Jiri Benc wrote: Setting of address of WDS remote peer wasn't possible by a WE call. Remote WDS peer can be understood as a remote AP and SIOCSIWAP/SIOCGIWAP are unused in WDS mode, so let's use them. This sounds good, but I was unable to get this

Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/13] d80211: allow WDS remote to by set by WE

2006-03-15 Thread Jiri Benc
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 09:52:26 -0800, Jouni Malinen wrote: This sounds good, but I was unable to get this working. I created a WDS link with initial peer address 00:01:02:03:04:05. This added the netdev and STA entry correctly. However, when I run iwconfig wds0 ap 00:11:22:33:44:55, I do not see

Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/13] d80211: allow WDS remote to by set by WE

2006-03-15 Thread Jouni Malinen
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 07:24:05PM +0100, Jiri Benc wrote: On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 09:52:26 -0800, Jouni Malinen wrote: This sounds good, but I was unable to get this working. I created a WDS link with initial peer address 00:01:02:03:04:05. This added the netdev and STA entry correctly.

[RFC/PATCH 1/13] d80211: allow WDS remote to by set by WE

2006-03-06 Thread Jiri Benc
Setting of address of WDS remote peer wasn't possible by a WE call. Remote WDS peer can be understood as a remote AP and SIOCSIWAP/SIOCGIWAP are unused in WDS mode, so let's use them. Signed-off-by: Jiri Benc [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: dscape/net/d80211/ieee80211.c