Re: [RFC] Network namespaces a path to mergable code.

2006-06-28 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Cedric Le Goater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How that proposal differs from the initial Daniel's patchset ? how far was > that patchset to reach a similar agreement ? My impression is as follows. The OpenVz implementation and mine work on the same basic principles of handling the network stack

Re: [RFC] Network namespaces a path to mergable code.

2006-06-28 Thread Cedric Le Goater
Hello, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Thinking about this I am going to suggest a slightly different direction > for get a patchset we can merge. > > First we concentrate on the fundamentals. > - How we mark a device as belonging to a specific network namespace. > - How we mark a socket as belonging

[RFC] Network namespaces a path to mergable code.

2006-06-27 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Thinking about this I am going to suggest a slightly different direction for get a patchset we can merge. First we concentrate on the fundamentals. - How we mark a device as belonging to a specific network namespace. - How we mark a socket as belonging to a specific network namespace. As part of