On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 08:45:33AM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> As far as indicating that the interfaces are meant to be enslaved I
> wonder if we couldn't look at tweaking the PCI layout of the guest and
> use that to indicate that a given set of interfaces are meant to be
> bonded. For example
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 11:28 PM, achiad shochat
wrote:
> On 5 December 2017 at 21:20, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 11:59:17AM +0200, achiad shochat wrote:
>>> Then we'll have a single solution for both netvsc and virtio (and any
>>> other PV device).
>>> And we could handl
On 5 December 2017 at 21:20, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 11:59:17AM +0200, achiad shochat wrote:
>> Then we'll have a single solution for both netvsc and virtio (and any
>> other PV device).
>> And we could handle the VF DMA dirt issue agnostically.
>
> For the record, I wo
On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 14:29:28 -0800
Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 11:59:17 +0200, achiad shochat wrote:
> > I second Jacob - having a netdev of one device driver enslave a netdev
> > of another device driver is an awkward a-symmetric model.
> > Regardless of whether they
On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 11:59:17 +0200, achiad shochat wrote:
> I second Jacob - having a netdev of one device driver enslave a netdev
> of another device driver is an awkward a-symmetric model.
> Regardless of whether they share the same backend device.
> Only I am not sure the Linu
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 01:52:26PM -0800, Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 21:20:07 +0200
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 11:59:17AM +0200, achiad shochat wrote:
> > > Then we'll have a single solution for both netvsc and virtio (and any
> > > other PV devi
On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 21:20:07 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 11:59:17AM +0200, achiad shochat wrote:
> > Then we'll have a single solution for both netvsc and virtio (and any
> > other PV device).
> > And we could handle the VF DMA dirt issue agnostically.
>
> For th
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 11:59:17AM +0200, achiad shochat wrote:
> Then we'll have a single solution for both netvsc and virtio (and any
> other PV device).
> And we could handle the VF DMA dirt issue agnostically.
For the record, I won't block patches adding this kist to virtio
on the basis that t
On 4 December 2017 at 18:30, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 1:51 AM, achiad shochat
> wrote:
>> On 3 December 2017 at 19:35, Stephen Hemminger
>> wrote:
>>> On Sun, 3 Dec 2017 11:14:37 +0200
>>> achiad shochat wrote:
>>>
On 3 December 2017 at 07:05, Michael S. Tsirkin wro
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 1:51 AM, achiad shochat
wrote:
> On 3 December 2017 at 19:35, Stephen Hemminger
> wrote:
>> On Sun, 3 Dec 2017 11:14:37 +0200
>> achiad shochat wrote:
>>
>>> On 3 December 2017 at 07:05, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> > On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 12:08:59PM -0800, Shannon Nel
On 3 December 2017 at 19:35, Stephen Hemminger
wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Dec 2017 11:14:37 +0200
> achiad shochat wrote:
>
>> On 3 December 2017 at 07:05, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> > On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 12:08:59PM -0800, Shannon Nelson wrote:
>> >> On 11/30/2017 6:11 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote
On Sun, 3 Dec 2017 11:14:37 +0200
achiad shochat wrote:
> On 3 December 2017 at 07:05, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 12:08:59PM -0800, Shannon Nelson wrote:
> >> On 11/30/2017 6:11 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:08:45AM +0200, achiad s
On 3 December 2017 at 07:05, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 12:08:59PM -0800, Shannon Nelson wrote:
>> On 11/30/2017 6:11 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:08:45AM +0200, achiad shochat wrote:
>> > > Re. problem #2:
>> > > Indeed the best way to add
On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 12:08:59PM -0800, Shannon Nelson wrote:
> On 11/30/2017 6:11 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:08:45AM +0200, achiad shochat wrote:
> > > Re. problem #2:
> > > Indeed the best way to address it seems to be to enslave the VF driver
> > > netdev unde
On 11/30/2017 6:11 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:08:45AM +0200, achiad shochat wrote:
Re. problem #2:
Indeed the best way to address it seems to be to enslave the VF driver
netdev under a persistent anchor netdev.
And it's indeed desired to allow (but not enforce) PV n
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 12:48:22PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 15:54:40 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 07:51:38PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 11:29:56 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > On 2017年11月29日 03:27, Jesse Brand
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 15:54:40 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 07:51:38PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 11:29:56 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > On 2017年11月29日 03:27, Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
> > > > Hi, I'd like to get some feedback on a proposal t
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 11:29:56AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> If my understanding is correct there's no need to for any extension of
> virtio spec.
There appears to be a concern that some existing configurations
might use same MAC for an unrelated reason. Not sure what
that could be, but for sure,
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:08:45AM +0200, achiad shochat wrote:
> Re. problem #2:
> Indeed the best way to address it seems to be to enslave the VF driver
> netdev under a persistent anchor netdev.
> And it's indeed desired to allow (but not enforce) PV netdev and VF
> netdev to work in conjunction
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 07:51:38PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 11:29:56 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > On 2017年11月29日 03:27, Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
> > > Hi, I'd like to get some feedback on a proposal to enhance virtio-net
> > > to ease configuration of a VM and that would en
On 30 November 2017 at 05:29, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2017年11月29日 03:27, Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
>>
>> Hi, I'd like to get some feedback on a proposal to enhance virtio-net
>> to ease configuration of a VM and that would enable live migration of
>> passthrough network SR-IOV devices.
>>
>> Toda
On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 20:10:09 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 19:51:38 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 11:29:56 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > On 2017年11月29日 03:27, Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
> > > commit 0c195567a8f6e82ea5535cd9f1d54a1626dd233e
> > > Aut
On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 19:51:38 -0800
Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 11:29:56 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > On 2017年11月29日 03:27, Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
> > > Hi, I'd like to get some feedback on a proposal to enhance
> > > virtio-net to ease configuration of a VM and that would enabl
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 11:29:56 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 2017年11月29日 03:27, Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
> > Hi, I'd like to get some feedback on a proposal to enhance virtio-net
> > to ease configuration of a VM and that would enable live migration of
> > passthrough network SR-IOV devices.
> >
> > T
On 2017年11月29日 03:27, Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
Hi, I'd like to get some feedback on a proposal to enhance virtio-net
to ease configuration of a VM and that would enable live migration of
passthrough network SR-IOV devices.
Today we have SR-IOV network devices (VFs) that can be passed into a VM
25 matches
Mail list logo
