On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 2:38 PM Or Gerlitz wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 8:19 PM Jakub Kicinski
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 17:20:43 +0100, John Hurley wrote:
> > > > > In this case the hw driver will receive the rules from the tunnel
> > > > > device directly.
> > > > > The driver can t
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 8:19 PM Jakub Kicinski
wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 17:20:43 +0100, John Hurley wrote:
> > > > In this case the hw driver will receive the rules from the tunnel
> > > > device directly.
> > > > The driver can then offload them as it sees fit.
> > >
> > > if both instances of
On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 17:20:43 +0100, John Hurley wrote:
> > > In this case the hw driver will receive the rules from the tunnel device
> > > directly.
> > > The driver can then offload them as it sees fit.
> >
> > if both instances of the hw drivers (uplink0, uplink1) register to get
> > the rules
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 4:53 PM Or Gerlitz wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 6:44 PM John Hurley wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 3:28 PM Or Gerlitz wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 7:55 AM Jakub Kicinski
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > This patchset introduces as an alternative to egdev offload by
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 6:44 PM John Hurley wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 3:28 PM Or Gerlitz wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 7:55 AM Jakub Kicinski
> > wrote:
> > > This patchset introduces as an alternative to egdev offload by allowing a
> > > driver to register for block updates when an e
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 3:28 PM Or Gerlitz wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 7:55 AM Jakub Kicinski
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > This set contains a rough RFC implementation of a proposed [1] replacement
> > for egdev cls_flower offloads. I did some last minute restructuring
> > and removal of pa
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 7:55 AM Jakub Kicinski
wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> This set contains a rough RFC implementation of a proposed [1] replacement
> for egdev cls_flower offloads. I did some last minute restructuring
> and removal of parts I felt were unnecessary, so if there are glaring bugs
> they are
Hi!
This set contains a rough RFC implementation of a proposed [1] replacement
for egdev cls_flower offloads. I did some last minute restructuring
and removal of parts I felt were unnecessary, so if there are glaring bugs
they are probably mine, not John's :) but hopefully this will give an idea
