Le 01/09/2016 à 15:21, David Lebrun a écrit :
> On 08/29/2016 05:31 PM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
>> This looks fine. But, i am just trying to see if this can be rtnetlink.
>> Have you considered it already ?.
>> We would like to keep the API consistent or abstracted to accommodate
>> SR-MPLS in the
>>
On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 15:25:14 +0200
David Lebrun wrote:
> On 08/31/2016 07:10 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > Since these are for control operations why a mutex?
>
> I am not sure to understand the question. The spinlock is used on the
> RCU write side of the namespace-wide parameters to preven
On 08/31/2016 07:10 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Since these are for control operations why a mutex?
I am not sure to understand the question. The spinlock is used on the
RCU write side of the namespace-wide parameters to prevent concurrent
writes.
David
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP di
On 08/29/2016 05:31 PM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
> This looks fine. But, i am just trying to see if this can be rtnetlink.
> Have you considered it already ?.
> We would like to keep the API consistent or abstracted to accommodate SR-MPLS
> in the
> future too. so, any abstraction there will help.
>
>
On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 17:52:40 +0200
David Lebrun wrote:
> +static struct nla_policy seg6_genl_policy[SEG6_ATTR_MAX + 1] = {
> + [SEG6_ATTR_DST] = { .type = NLA_BINARY,
> + .len = sizeof(struct in6_addr) },
> + [SEG6_ATTR_DSTLEN] = {
On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 17:52:40 +0200
David Lebrun wrote:
> +static struct genl_ops seg6_genl_ops[] = {
> + {
> + .cmd= SEG6_CMD_SETHMAC,
> + .doit = seg6_genl_sethmac,
> + .policy = seg6_genl_policy,
> + .flags = GENL_ADMIN_PERM,
> + },
On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 17:52:40 +0200
David Lebrun wrote:
> +
> +static inline struct seg6_pernet_data *seg6_pernet(struct net *net)
> +{
> + return net->ipv6.seg6_data;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void seg6_pernet_lock(struct net *net)
> +{
> + spin_lock(&seg6_pernet(net)->lock);
> +}
> +
> +
Le 26/08/2016 à 17:52, David Lebrun a écrit :
[snip]
> +#define SEG6_VERSION_MAJOR 0
> +#define SEG6_VERSION_MINOR 30
nit: This kind of macros are not used anymore upstream. The git sha1 or the
linux version perfectly identifies the version.
Le 29/08/2016 à 17:31, Roopa Prabhu a écrit :
> On 8/26/16, 8:52 AM, David Lebrun wrote:
>> This patch adds the necessary hooks and structures to provide support
>> for SR-IPv6 control plane, essentially the Generic Netlink commands
>> that will be used for userspace control over the Segment Routin
On 8/26/16, 8:52 AM, David Lebrun wrote:
> This patch adds the necessary hooks and structures to provide support
> for SR-IPv6 control plane, essentially the Generic Netlink commands
> that will be used for userspace control over the Segment Routing
> kernel structures.
>
> The genetlink commands p
This patch adds the necessary hooks and structures to provide support
for SR-IPv6 control plane, essentially the Generic Netlink commands
that will be used for userspace control over the Segment Routing
kernel structures.
The genetlink commands provide control over two different structures:
tunnel
11 matches
Mail list logo
