Re: [RFC 5/7] wlcore: avoid fragile snprintf use

2016-03-09 Thread Kalle Valo
Rasmus Villemoes writes: > Appending to a buffer like this is not guaranteed to work (passing > overlapping src and dst buffers to snprintf is undefined > behaviour). The standard and safe idiom is to keep track of the > current string length. > > Signed-off-by: Rasmus

[RFC 5/7] wlcore: avoid fragile snprintf use

2016-03-08 Thread Rasmus Villemoes
Appending to a buffer like this is not guaranteed to work (passing overlapping src and dst buffers to snprintf is undefined behaviour). The standard and safe idiom is to keep track of the current string length. Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes ---