On 17-01-31 11:39 AM, tndave wrote:
>
>
> On 01/27/2017 01:33 PM, John Fastabend wrote:
>> This is an experimental implementation of rx zero copy for af_packet.
>> Its a bit rough and likely has errors but the plan is to clean it up
>> over the next few months.
>>
>> And seeing I said I would pos
On 17-01-31 08:30 AM, Sowmini Varadhan wrote:
> On (01/27/17 13:33), John Fastabend wrote:
>>
>> This is an experimental implementation of rx zero copy for af_packet.
>> Its a bit rough and likely has errors but the plan is to clean it up
>> over the next few months.
>>
>> And seeing I said I would
On 01/27/2017 01:33 PM, John Fastabend wrote:
This is an experimental implementation of rx zero copy for af_packet.
Its a bit rough and likely has errors but the plan is to clean it up
over the next few months.
And seeing I said I would post it in another thread a few days back
here it is.
T
On (01/27/17 13:33), John Fastabend wrote:
>
> This is an experimental implementation of rx zero copy for af_packet.
> Its a bit rough and likely has errors but the plan is to clean it up
> over the next few months.
>
> And seeing I said I would post it in another thread a few days back
> here it
From: John Fastabend
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 13:33:20 -0800
> This is an experimental implementation of rx zero copy for af_packet.
> Its a bit rough and likely has errors but the plan is to clean it up
> over the next few months.
>
> And seeing I said I would post it in another thread a few days
This is an experimental implementation of rx zero copy for af_packet.
Its a bit rough and likely has errors but the plan is to clean it up
over the next few months.
And seeing I said I would post it in another thread a few days back
here it is.
Comments welcome and use at your own risk.
Thanks,
