Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] usbnet: Get rid of spammy usbnet "kevent X may have been dropped"

2017-09-19 Thread Oliver Neukum
Am Dienstag, den 19.09.2017, 09:15 -0700 schrieb Douglas Anderson: > > ALSO NOTE: If somehow some of the types of work need to be repeated if > usbnet_defer_kevent() is called multiple times then that should be > quite easy to accomplish without dropping any work on the floor.  We > can just keep

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] usbnet: Get rid of spammy usbnet "kevent X may have been dropped"

2017-09-19 Thread Bjørn Mork
Douglas Anderson writes: > Every once in a while when my system is under a bit of stress I see > some spammy messages show up in my logs that say: > > kevent X may have been dropped > > As far as I can tell these messages aren't terribly useful. I agree, FWIW. These

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] usbnet: Get rid of spammy usbnet "kevent X may have been dropped"

2017-09-19 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Douglas Anderson wrote: > Every once in a while when my system is under a bit of stress I see > some spammy messages show up in my logs that say: > > kevent X may have been dropped > > As far as I can tell these messages aren't terribly

[RFC PATCH 1/3] usbnet: Get rid of spammy usbnet "kevent X may have been dropped"

2017-09-19 Thread Douglas Anderson
Every once in a while when my system is under a bit of stress I see some spammy messages show up in my logs that say: kevent X may have been dropped As far as I can tell these messages aren't terribly useful. The comments around the messages make me think that either workqueues used to work